Watch the demo carefully, the grey text is the text that is interim and does sometimes change, whereas the black text are responses from the recognizer that are marked final and will not change. The demo sets it to true so we get early, interim results that may change. The default value for interimResults is false, meaning that the only results returned by the recognizer are final and will not change. In this demo, we set it to true, so that recognition will continue even if the user pauses while speaking. This mode is great for simple text like short input fields. The default value for continuous is false, meaning that when the user stops talking, speech recognition will end. Google gives you the option of exporting your data from Reader through Google Takeout. But there are a couple of substitutes out there like Feedly, The Old Reader, NetVibes, etc. if ( ! ( 'webkitSpeechRecognition' in window ) ) A couple of months ago, Google announced that it was retiring its web feed reader Google Reader.As a long-time user of the service, I was disappointed. (Since the API is still experimental, it's currently vendor prefixed.) Lastly, we create the webkitSpeechRecognition object which provides the speech interface, and set some of its attributes and event handlers. If not, we suggest the user upgrades their browser. First, we check to see if the browser supports the Web Speech API by checking if the webkitSpeechRecognition object exists. We learned that if we try to redefine existing behaviors (like sharing) users get upset.Let’s take a look under the hood. To some degree that's up to each user, but one nice thing about liking is that it has less baggage associated with it. * I've seen some wondering what the difference between liking, sharing and starring is.
However, if you'd like to get at all of the liker information for a specific item, you can plug in an item ID into the /reader/api/0/likers API endpoint, and then get at it in either JSON or XML formats.
That number may go up (or down) as we see how this feature is used. Google Drive has always been a great place to store HTML, JavaScript and CSS files so they are secure and available from anywhere. This means that as a publisher you can extract this information and see which of your items Reader users find interesting.įor now liking information that is included inline in the feed is limited to 100 users, mainly for performance reasons. If you use Reader's view of a feed, for example The Big Picture's, you can see the elements there too. Liking information isn't just limited to Reader shared item feeds. More interestingly, you can plug these into the Social Graph API to see who these users are. Users are represented by their IDs, which you can use to generate Reader shared page URLs. It would therefore make sense to be pretty liberal with liking data, and in fact Reader does try to expose liking in our feeds. One of the nice things about liking is that it's completely public*.
Reader recently launched liking (and a bunch of other features). I started this as another protip comment on this FriendFeed thread about Reader likes but it got kind of long, so here goes: